"Electing" Board Members

Each year community associations in Oregon and Washington hold annual meetings of the membership.  The primary purpose of the annual meeting is to elect individuals to the board of directors. Let's suppose that an association has a board of directors comprised of 7 individual members. At the annual meeting, 3 of the director positions will be open (the term of office for the remaining 4 directors is the following year). Now, let's suppose that only 3 individuals have been nominated prior to the annual meeting. In other words, there are 3 spots open and only 3 people have agreed to run for the positions. Is it necessary to go through the steps of "electing" these individuals? The short answer is, yes.  Here's why.

Most bylaws state that board members must be "elected."  Robert's Rules states:

If the bylaws require the election of officers to be by ballot and there is only one nominee for an office, the ballot must nevertheless be taken for that office[.] (RRO, 11th ed., Section 46)

But there's another reason.  Under Robert's Rules of Order members are entitled to nominate candidates from the floor.  Although only 3 individuals were nominated prior to the annual meeting, other owners may desire to nominate additional members at the actual annual meeting.  Once again, Robert's Rules states:

[M]embers still have the right, on the ballot, to cast "write-in votes" for other eligible persons.

In summary, going through the formal steps of balloting and electing when the outcome is obvious may seem tedious.  However, following the formalities lessens the likelihood of legal challenges down the road.

Board Member Resignations

Suppose that during the middle of a board meeting a director stands up and says "I quit!". Immediately, the director leaves the meeting.  Does this constitute a resignation from the board of directors? And what if the director returns to the meeting minutes later and explains that he or she didn't really intend to resign, and now wants to return to the board of directors? Most community association bylaws require that board member resignations be in writing.  Further, Robert's Rules of Order suggests that resignations must be "accepted" by the remaining directors:

The duties of a position must not be abandoned until a resignation has been accepted and becomes effective, or at least there has been a reasonable opportunity for it to be accepted.

The acceptance is usually accomplished by a motion to accept the resignation, but recording the resignation in the minutes, without a motion or vote, is likely sufficient to accept the resignation. The act of recording the resignation in the meeting minutes may satisfy the "in writing" requirement.

But what if the resignation is oral, like in the hypothetical above?  If the resignation is never memorialized in writing and it is obvious that the director resigned, i.e. they don't attend the next board meeting, they cease communications with the board, etc., then the board is entitled fill the vacancy regardless of whether the resignation is in writing.

Back to the hypothetical. Let's assume the director who proclaimed they quit and left the meeting returns minutes later, before the board could act or even discuss the resignation.  In that case, it's not obvious that the director desired to abandoned their duties and resign, and the board has not acted or relied on the resignation. The oral resignation should be considered ineffective.

If a director formally resigns in writing, can that resignation be revoked? Generally, written resignations may not be revoked. This is especially true if the board has already appointed a replacement to fill the vacancy.  Oregon law, however, suggests that the board of directors may allow revocation of a resignation:

Once delivered, a notice of resignation is irrevocable unless revocation is permitted by the board of directors. (ORS Chapter 65.321(3)).

In other words, the board may exercise discretion to accept a revocation after a director has formally resigned.

Let's skip ahead and assume a resignation is effective and has not been revoked. This creates a vacancy on the board. The general process to follow is: the remaining directors vote to appoint a replacement to fill the vacancy. This can be done even if the vacancy has left less than a quorum of directors. The individual appointed then serves the remainder of the term.

As always, be sure to carefully review your Bylaws to determine if there are provisions governing resignations or the filling of vacancies.