Each year community associations in Oregon and Washington hold annual meetings of the membership. The primary purpose of the annual meeting is to elect individuals to the board of directors. Let's suppose that an association has a board of directors comprised of 7 individual members. At the annual meeting, 3 of the director positions will be open (the term of office for the remaining 4 directors is the following year). Now, let's suppose that only 3 individuals have been nominated prior to the annual meeting. In other words, there are 3 spots open and only 3 people have agreed to run for the positions. Is it necessary to go through the steps of "electing" these individuals? The short answer is, yes. Here's why.
Most bylaws state that board members must be "elected." Robert's Rules states:
If the bylaws require the election of officers to be by ballot and there is only one nominee for an office, the ballot must nevertheless be taken for that office[.] (RRO, 11th ed., Section 46)
But there's another reason. Under Robert's Rules of Order members are entitled to nominate candidates from the floor. Although only 3 individuals were nominated prior to the annual meeting, other owners may desire to nominate additional members at the actual annual meeting. Once again, Robert's Rules states:
[M]embers still have the right, on the ballot, to cast "write-in votes" for other eligible persons.
In summary, going through the formal steps of balloting and electing when the outcome is obvious may seem tedious. However, following the formalities lessens the likelihood of legal challenges down the road.